A few days ago, Rocky’s blog was shunned by a potential advertiser simply because his high traffic blog experiences a high bounce rate. I never thought that a high bounce rate can affect one’s bargaining power when it comes to adverts. I have always thought that as long as one’s blog gets a lot of traffic, advertisers will scramble for it. According to the advertiser who turned down Rocky’s blog, the ever exciting Entrecard is one of the services that are responsible for high bounce rates. In my recent post, I pointed out some of the things that Entrecard must do in order to minimize bounce rate and make Entrecard powered blogs more advertiser friendly. So far, this post has received a number of exciting comments. In one of the comments, Richard Cotta says
Advertisers will cite all kinds of reasons for why they don’t want to advertise. A high bounce rate does not sound like a good reason. If the advertiser runs a top banner advert, every visitor will at least see their advert.
I agree with Richard entirely. Running a very attractive top page banner advert on a high traffic blog that has a high bounce rate would be great. Since the affinity of visitors to this blog is low, most of these visitors will end up clicking the advertiser’s banner. The advertiser will end up gaining most of the traffic that would have bounced. On the other hand, if a high traffic blog has a low bounce rate; most visitors tend to enjoy reading posts and making comments on it without clicking the advert banners. Therefore, most of these visitors end up leaving the blog by clicking links in the comments section to other exciting blogs whose authors have left some great comments on some of posts. These are just my random views but I would like to ask Internet marketing gurus to do some research and analysis to come up with the real picture. But as of now I maintain the view that advertisers who shun blogs with high traffic but high bounce rate are wrong. On what do they base the fact that high traffic/high bounce rate blogs cannot bring enough traffic to their sites? My simple advice to Rocky is that he must ask his potential advertiser for a short term contract in which he must run test adverts. Both parties must jointly monitor the impact of these particular adverts on the sales and revenue stats over a fixed period of time. Then they must compare these stats with those of the other established blogs on which this particular advertiser enjoys running his adverts. I am sure Rocky’s blog can easily emerge as a better platform compared to some of “good” blogs. Of course, in the event of such a success, Rocky must be paid based on the achieved impact.
Note: Although Rocky is a good friend of mine, he did not disclose the name of his potential advertiser.
Related posts:

11 users commented in " Are advertisers who shun high traffic blogs due to high bounce rate correct? "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackI found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you.
Matt Hanson
[Reply]
Hi Clement,
You’ve made some really interesting points. A one day or one week test period is probably a good way to prove your blog’s worth to doubtful advertisers. I’ll probably do this next time.
I never thought that visitors that cause high bounce rate to a blog have higher chances of clicking on ads. Interesting!
At first, I thought of disclosing the advertiser’s identity to all my blog readers and I’m more than certain that they’ll receive a lot of criticisms, especially from the Entrecard fanatics, but I believe keeping their identity confidential is the best thing to do. Assuming, I’ve disclosed the said advertiser, I’ll only end up doing them a favor… extra publicity. Besides, I keep my dealings with my advertisers confidential.
Thanks for the mention and the link love.
You’re doing great. Happy blogging.
[Reply]
Rocky
These are just my random views based Richard’s comment. We may get a better picture after you run some test adverts for your potential advertiser. And I must say I am very happy because you have demonstrated maturity by not disclosing the name of this advertiser.As it is, s/he will hold you in high esteem and it will be easy for you two to strike a deal.
[Reply]
I am no expert, but have been to a few boot camps recently and bounce rates is not one of the top reasons an advertiser would not want to work with you. There are tons of reasons, it is their choice, but bounce doesn’t seem like it could be the ONLY reason!!??
[Reply]
This is an interesting topic.Clement , i believe high bouncy rate is not an issue at all.If it is it will be just one of the reasons why they advertisers shun high traffic blogs
[Reply]
@Anonymous: Great to learn that from your bootcamps’ experience, bounce rates are not one of the reasons an advertizer would not want to advertize on your blog.I thought so as well.
@Innocent: Maybe, it is just one of the scapegoats advertizers use against a high traffic blog if they do not want to sign a deal with its owners.
[Reply]
thanks for the post. i hope to read some more.
Best regards from Sebbi
[Reply]
interesting post about traffic. i think is very useful
[Reply]
Learning about bounce rate with blogs was very interesting.
Thanks for the info,
http://www.increasetargetedwebsitetraffic.net
[Reply]
@Ken and Mike, Good to learn that you found this post very useful and interesting.Please do come back for my upcoming posts.
[Reply]
Hi, I found you site from Google. Very interesting topic, I never ever paid any attention to the Bounce-Rate, maybe now I should! Thanks for bringing the bounce rate issue to my attention!
[Reply]
I would really appreciate if you could use your name when commenting.Using just keywords makes your comment seem spammy, and it's liable to get deleted.Please read my comment policy for more details.Many thanks for your cooperation!
Got an opinion? Leave a civil reply.