As the price of fuel continues to increase, Genepax, a Japanese company, has stepped in with an innovative solution which will surely transform the automobile industry.Last Thursday, in Osaka, this company unveiled a car that uses water as fuel and does not emit CO2.
Prototyped vehicle (Photo:TechOn News)
On the other hand, a wikipedia article has already criticized this piece of innovation saying that
The car as it is described by Genepax is a Perpetual Motion device. Such a device or system would be in violation of the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy can never be created or destroyed, and is therefore impossible. If Genepax would succeed in proving that their claims are true, then the theory of relativity as well as other aspects of modern science will be disproven.
The only alternative would be that Genepax is currently misleading the media as well as the public, and that a different source of energy is used for the car.
Although I am a huge fan of wikipedia, I do not like this sort of of criticism. If someone has some good scientific facts against this piece of innovation, they should just come in the open and air them out. Why do they like hiding behind wikipedia?I somehow think these anonymous critics are folks whose business interests are being threatened by this development. Is it not scientific to prove that some traditional scientific theories are wrong?Obviously, you cannot easily come up with some ground breaking research results if you stick to the traditional way of doing things. As far as I am concerned, some laws of science are bound to be disproved. That is why research is still taking place.
It is my hope that further experiments will be carried out on this car and that automobile companies will support this initiative overwhelmingly.When this car makes it to the showrooms, the world will be transformed!
Related posts:
13 users commented in " A car that runs on water has been unveiled in Osaka, Japan "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackbackthanks for dropping by clement, how unfortunate that such a fantastic innovation will be vigorously resisted against because of oil rich individuals and states, people would rather destroy their environments and be rich, its a shame!
Wow, that’s amazing. I’d love to see more vehicles like this. We need them in canada.
Mike
http://www.cmstester.com
I think that the car is very impressive – if it works as advertised.
Like you, I’m not impressed by the wikipedia quote. That sort of bias has no place in an ‘encyclopedia’ of any kind.
i see. I believe that car must be expensive.
The car will be expensive and i guess it’s something like city variant. I hope that in future we’ll see a lot of such cars on the streets, but today it is still problematic. But I believe in these technologies.
I see that that Wikipedia article has since been edited to adopt a neutral point of view in respect of Genepax’s fuel cell invention.
Reading the TechOn article on GenePax, it seems that they are positioning their fuel cell not to drive an electric car directly, but rather to recharge the vehicle’s electric batteries.
The other application seems to be in providing a residence with its own power generator.
Both applications would be very useful. Genepax’s fuel cell could be used to extend the range of electric cars, which are limited in range (under 200 kilometres per charge).
btw, water can sometimes more expensive than gas
Hello there!!
I am sending you a note from OBAMA-nation (also known as the United States)!
{waves}
Thank you for announcing this new car! I had not read about this in our country yet! I am sure the U.S. automakers would like to keep it a huge secret now that gas is over $4/gallon here!
{chuckles}
Lisa
Agree with WatchUOnline, sometimes water can be more expensive than gassoline
i think this is a best solution right now..
it is a good development..
shame to the one who feels that science theories are everlasting, they are bound to cahenge and be disproved.
while some fear that the car is expensive; at least you can give it a price but the cost of global warming is incalculable.
But the challenge is the succesion period fo the petroleaum driven vehicles and the upcoming ones namely the water run vehicle and the electric vehicles.
The only question I may ask is if all the vehicles were to run on water does the world have enough water for the vehicles and other competitive necessiating uses..
I think there should be a break even point for how many of these we can have and how many of the petrooleum vehicles we can also have.
Otherwise, it is true that most people who are against green energy are interseted parties in the oil industry. they try to bring up very good decieving economic and scientific analysis.
With the oil prices going up by the minute… This car couldn’t have come at a better time. Its a very good idea.
We my need to accept that the key to our energy future may not come from the government or big energy companies, but rather from small research and development companies and individual inventors working on water cars, fuel cells and on board hydrogen fuel generators.