<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Journal paper review:Why does the process take so long?</title> <atom:link href="http://nthambazale.com/2008/09/journal-paper-review-why-does-it-take-so-long/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nthambazale.com/2008/09/journal-paper-review-why-does-it-take-so-long/</link> <description>Ramblings on technology and its use in the fight against poverty</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Exterior aluminum railings</title><link>http://nthambazale.com/2008/09/journal-paper-review-why-does-it-take-so-long/comment-page-1/#comment-3787</link> <dc:creator>Exterior aluminum railings</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:38:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nthambazale.com/?p=867#comment-3787</guid> <description>Journal paper review takes so much time because of necessity to study a amounts of information and then structure it</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journal paper review takes so much time because of necessity to study a amounts of information and then structure it</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Care Pet</title><link>http://nthambazale.com/2008/09/journal-paper-review-why-does-it-take-so-long/comment-page-1/#comment-3301</link> <dc:creator>Care Pet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:02:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nthambazale.com/?p=867#comment-3301</guid> <description>A tip on journal paper review is to see if there is a theory in the paper and if the results is meaningful and worthwhile.It is better not to let someone know you review his paper at any time before or after.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tip on journal paper review is to see if there is a theory in the paper and if the results is meaningful and worthwhile.It is better not to let someone know you review his paper at any time before or after.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M. Yrittäjyys</title><link>http://nthambazale.com/2008/09/journal-paper-review-why-does-it-take-so-long/comment-page-1/#comment-2678</link> <dc:creator>M. Yrittäjyys</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:44:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nthambazale.com/?p=867#comment-2678</guid> <description>Journal paper reviews are interesting topic. I have tought about why does processing them take so long but on the other hand, its not easy work. You see, there are lots of sources to verify etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journal paper reviews are interesting topic. I have tought about why does processing them take so long but on the other hand, its not easy work. You see, there are lots of sources to verify etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: George at Inks Blog</title><link>http://nthambazale.com/2008/09/journal-paper-review-why-does-it-take-so-long/comment-page-1/#comment-2472</link> <dc:creator>George at Inks Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:15:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nthambazale.com/?p=867#comment-2472</guid> <description>Definitely... the journal process could use some serious streamlining.I work as a researcher in bioengineering-related fields, and it&#039;s not uncommon for the journal review process to extend up to a year.-GeorgeGeorge at Inks Blogs last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://inksblog.com/reviews/why-4inkjets-is-my-preferred-ink-supplier/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why 4Inkjets Is My Preferred Ink Supplier&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely&#8230; the journal process could use some serious streamlining.</p><p>I work as a researcher in bioengineering-related fields, and it&#8217;s not uncommon for the journal review process to extend up to a year.</p><p>-George</p><p>George at Inks Blogs last blog post..<a
href="http://inksblog.com/reviews/why-4inkjets-is-my-preferred-ink-supplier/" rel="nofollow">Why 4Inkjets Is My Preferred Ink Supplier</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MARBLE HOST</title><link>http://nthambazale.com/2008/09/journal-paper-review-why-does-it-take-so-long/comment-page-1/#comment-2456</link> <dc:creator>MARBLE HOST</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:20:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nthambazale.com/?p=867#comment-2456</guid> <description>This is a very interesting article, good information and helpful. Thank you</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting article, good information and helpful. Thank you</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richael Neet</title><link>http://nthambazale.com/2008/09/journal-paper-review-why-does-it-take-so-long/comment-page-1/#comment-2410</link> <dc:creator>Richael Neet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:39:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nthambazale.com/?p=867#comment-2410</guid> <description>Usually the process of reviewing is held deliberately for the reviewers to fulfill their own agenda. We may never know for sure, but this is very common in the environment I live in. The &quot;bureaucratic&quot; process may delay a simple approval to as much as a year.PS: Admin, you have some spelling mistakes in the post. One instance is here:
&quot;...comments in November 2007 and some of the reviewers were blamimg me for....&quot;
Correction: &quot;blamimg&quot; should be &quot;blaming&quot;Richael Neets last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freeworldcommunity.info/others/preventing-yourself-from-sabotaging-your-goals/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Preventing yourself from Sabotaging your Goals&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually the process of reviewing is held deliberately for the reviewers to fulfill their own agenda. We may never know for sure, but this is very common in the environment I live in. The &#8220;bureaucratic&#8221; process may delay a simple approval to as much as a year.</p><p>PS: Admin, you have some spelling mistakes in the post. One instance is here:<br
/> &#8220;&#8230;comments in November 2007 and some of the reviewers were blamimg me for&#8230;.&#8221;<br
/> Correction: &#8220;blamimg&#8221; should be &#8220;blaming&#8221;</p><p>Richael Neets last blog post..<a
href="http://www.freeworldcommunity.info/others/preventing-yourself-from-sabotaging-your-goals/" rel="nofollow">Preventing yourself from Sabotaging your Goals</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jobs for 14 year olds</title><link>http://nthambazale.com/2008/09/journal-paper-review-why-does-it-take-so-long/comment-page-1/#comment-2373</link> <dc:creator>Jobs for 14 year olds</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 03:29:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nthambazale.com/?p=867#comment-2373</guid> <description>How to do a critical review of a single journal paper?
do i need to read up on all research relevant to the paper, or do i just critically review the one paper itself</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to do a critical review of a single journal paper?<br
/> do i need to read up on all research relevant to the paper, or do i just critically review the one paper itself</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: nthambazale.com @ 2010-03-15 17:32:47 by W3 Total Cache -->